Quantitative measurements of morphometric parameters of basin and sub basins have raised attraction of research in geology, geomorphology and hydrology since Horton’s period. In the present study, with the aid of Geographic Information System (GIS) several morphometric parameters were employed to understand the nature, landscape development and hydrologic responses of Sirsa river basin and its twelve sub basins (namely 1, 2, 3 etc.). Digital Elevation Model (DEM) was used to derive the relief and slope parameters; whether toposheets based digitized drainage network was used to calculate linear and areal aspects. Relative relief, dissection index, ruggedness index, average slope, stream frequency and drainage density were calculated from the basin by dividing it hundreds of one square km grids. Pearson correlation coefficient and probable error of correlation coefficient were determined between above mentioned parameters for all sub basins as well as basin. Justification of the correlations whether it were significant or not; and its relation to basin and sub basin development are analyzed. Overall analysis shows that the basin is normal, well drained and near-elongated.  The analysis of various morphometric parameter and their correlations indicate that sub basins are in late youth stage (sub basins 2, 6 and 7), transition stage between youth and maturity (sub basins 3, 8 and 10), mature stage (sub basins 1, 5 and 11) and late mature stage (sub basins 4, 9 and 12) of landscape development. The results are quite significant to justify the erosional status, influence of geologic and other factors on basin development. 


Morphometric parameters; Sirsa river basin; GIS; correlation; erosional status

Full Text:



Ahmed, S. A., Chandrashekarappa, K. N., Raj, S. K., Nischitha, V. and Kavitha, G.: Evaluation of morphometric parameters derived from ASTER and SRTM DEM – A study on Bandihole sub-watershed basin in Karnataka, J Indian Soc Rem Sen, 38, 227–238, 2010.

Carlston, C. W.: Drainage density and streamflow, US Geol Survey Prof Paper, 422-C, 1-8, 1963.

Easthernbrook, D. J.: Surface processes and landforms, Macmillian Pub Co, New York, 325, 1993.

Gregory, K. J., and Walling, D. E.: The variation of drainage density within a catchment, International Association of Scientific Hydrology, Bulletin, 13(2), 61-68, 1968.

Hadley, R. F., and Schumm, S. A.: Sediment sources and drainage basin characteristics in upper Cheyenne River basin, USGS Water-Supply Paper, 1531-B, 137-197, 1961.

Horton, R. E.: Drainage basin characteristics, Trans-Amer Geophys Union, 13, 350–361, 1932.

Horton, R. E.: Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology, Bull Geol Soc Am, 56, 275–370, 1945.

Ichim, I.: The relationship between sediment delivery ratio and stream order: a Romanian case study Processes, Proceedings of the Jerusalem Workshop, March-April, 1987.

Javed, A., Khanday, M. Y., and Ahmed, R.: Prioritization of sub-watersheds based on morphometric and land use analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques, J Indian Soc Rem Sen, 37, 261–274, 2009.

Leopold, L. B., and Miller, J. P.: Ephemeral streams: hydraulic factors and their relation to the drainage network, US Geol Survey prof paper, 282-A, 1956.

Mishra, S., and Nagarajan, R.: Morphometric analysis and prioritization of sub watersheds using GIS and Remote Sensing techniques: a case study of Odisha, India, International J Geomatics and Geosciences, 1(3), 501-510, 2010.

Miller, V. C.: A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Verginia and Tennessee, Project NR 389-042, Tech. Rept. 3, Columbia University, Dept. of Geology, ONR, Geography Branch, New York, 1953.

Morisawa, M. E.: Relation of morphometric properties to runoff in the Little Mill Creek, Ohio, drainage basin, Tech rept 17, Columbia Univ, Dept Geol, ONR, New York, 1959.

Morisawa, M.: Streams: Their dynamics and morphology, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968.

Philip, G., and Virdi, N. S.: Active faults and neotectonic activity in the Pinjaur Dun, northwestern Frontal Himalaya, Current Science, 92(4), 532-542, 2007.

Philip, G., Suresh, N., Bhakuni, S. S., and Gupta, V.: Paleoseismic investigation along Nalagarh thrust: evidence of late pleistocene earthquake in Pinjaur Dun, northwestern sub-Himalaya, J Asian Earth Sci, 40, 1056–1067, 2011.

Prasannakumar, V., Vijith, H., and Geetha, N.: Terrain evaluation through the assessment of geomorphometric parameters using DEM and GIS: case study of two major sub-watersheds in Attapady, South India, Arab J Geosci, doi:10.1007/s12517-011-0408-2, 2011.

Raiverman, V., Kunte S.V., and Mukherjea, A.: Basin geometry, Cenozoic sedimentation and hydrocarbon prospects in northwestern Himalaya and Indo-Gangetic plains, Petroleum Asia Journal, 6, 67–92, 1983.

Reddy, G. P. O., Maji, A. K., and Gajbhiye, K. S.: Drainage morphometry and its influence on landform characteristics in a basaltic terrain, Central India – a remote sensing and GIS approach, Inter J Applied Earth Obs Geoinfor, 6, 1–16, 2004.

Schumm, S. A.: The relation of drainage basin relief to sediment loss, Pub International Association of Hydrology, IUGG, Tenth Gen Assembly, Rome, 1, 216-219, 1954.

Schumm, S. A.: Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey, Bull Geol Soc Amer, 67, 597-646, 1956.

Singh, S., and Singh, M. C.: Morphomertric analysis of Kanhar river basin, National Geo J Ind, 43(1), 31-43, 1997.

Singh, S.: Geomorphology, Prayag Pustak Bhawan, Allahabad, 1998.

Singh, V., and Tandon, S. K.: The Pinjaur dun (intermontane longitudinal valley) and associated active mountain fronts, NW Himalaya: Tectonic geomorphology and morphotectonic evolution, Geomorphology, 102, 376-394, 2008.

Smith, K. G.: Standards for grading textures of erosional topography, Amer J Sci, 248, 655–668, 1950.

Sparks, B. W.: Geomorphology, Longman, London, 1974.

Strahler, A. N.: Dynamic basis of geomorphology, Bull Geol Soc Amer, 63, 923–938, 1952a.

Strahler, A. N.: Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography, Bull Geol Soc Amer, 63, 1117–1142, 1952b.

Strahler, A. N.: Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology, Trans Amer Geophys Union, 38, 913–920, 1957.

Strahler, A. N.: Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks, In: Chow VT (ed) Handbook of applied hydrology, McGraw Hill, New York, Section 4–11, 1964.

Thakkar, A. K., and Dhiman, S. D.: Morphometric analysis and prioritization of miniwatersheds in Mohr watershed, Gujarat using remote sensing and GIS techniques, J Indian Soc Rem Sen, 35(4), 313-321, 2007.

Tucker, G. E., and Bras, R. L.: Hillslope processes, drainage density and landscape morphology, Water Resour Res, 34(10), 2751-2764, 1998.

Verstappen, H. Th.: Applied geomorphology: geomorphological surveys for environmental development, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983.

Zavoianu, I.: Morphometry of drainage basin, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1985.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

ISSN: 1223-5334; eISSN: 2284-6379. Published in Romania




Large Visitor Globe